Why Do People Watch Wwe When Tna Has A Better Show?
Explain to me how wrestling fans that have been watching since the mid 90s atleast for me its been since the mid 80s but how do ya’ll still watch the WWE it is boring and oughta be crushed by fans that are tired of seeing all the bark no bite action they put on t.v its horrible and not wrestling its just Hollywood and for little kids so to cause a ratings war we need to start tuning in to TNA which has a way better roster you might have to get used to some new faces but they have familiar names with great and better young talent with alot better storylines.. watching the WWE makes me feel like I’m retarded because they have ruined the name of ECW and they dont care about the fans they care about being your only resort to wrestling well there not Give TNA a chance u might be suprised
Related posts
Tags: Better, ecw, Explain, mid 80s, new faces, People, show, tna, Watch, When, wwe
Posted on January 21st, 2010 at 1:15 am
why not watch BOTH? the more free wrestling on tv you can watch, the better. besides, while wwe isn’t as good as it should be, even tna has some pretty big flaws.
Posted on January 21st, 2010 at 5:23 am
Personally, I watch both. I like the WWE because it has more of an entertainment factor and given the fact that Vince McMahon has more money to invest in his product, he can do a lot more to keep fans tuned in. I watch TNA because they do put on better matches, have better gimmick matches, and their Knockouts and X Division really make the show what it is today.
Posted on January 21st, 2010 at 10:55 am
chances given, results, not much. TNA is as bad as WWE. They just got too many gimmicks going. EXCUSE ME? A BETTER STORYLINE?If i heard right, they made Kurt Angle into a soap opera called As Angle Turn. The only worthy thing in TNA is the women knockout division loaded with talent and produce better women match than E.come out dude, give me something VAILD why i should stop watching WWE and start watching Total Nonstop Angle?
Posted on January 21st, 2010 at 5:15 pm
omfg here we go again
TNA is good
But not as good as WWE
TNA has WAY better wrestlers than WWE
But WWE has more famous wrestlers even though some of them suck
Tna has only been on for like what 6-7 years
and WWE is like a 60 year old wrestling promotion
so i think TNA at some point will be better than WWE but not yet but at this point in time WWE is the best promotion
Posted on January 21st, 2010 at 10:04 pm
tna’s matches look so fake the wrestlers on TNA look like the divas matches on wwe where they are waiting to make sure their opponent is ready for the next move…it has huge flaws and more than half of its wrestlers look like JBL fat and overweight
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 3:20 am
I agree when Kennedy. TNA is full of WWE rejects.
For example B.g. James -Road Dogg
booker t
christian cage
christy hemme
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 9:53 am
You can wacth both and I don’t want to change the channel when i know all TNA do is steal storylines from WWE. And do pointless, terrible promos.
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 10:35 am
cause TNA is full of WWE rejects.
TNA sucks.
The only good thing about it are the skills their female wrestlers have.
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 11:37 am
i watch both and WWE is better
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 1:30 pm
I watch both! I like WWE and TNA.
Posted on January 22nd, 2010 at 3:49 pm
tna!tna!tna!